There was a lively discussion this week regarding Web 2.0 with several intriguing questions posed:
Is Web 2.0 primarily an information source, a learning environment, or both?
Is Web 2.0 merely a tool or is it enhancing learning in significant ways?
How do we define what constitutes Web 2.0?
My personal view is that Web 2.0 is both a tool (e.g. the technology) that is helping enhance learning in rather significant ways. It appears centered on a philosophy of construction knowledge on the fly via virtual learning environments (VLE). This still necessitates the need for a qualified instructor; however, the emphasis appears to have shifted from one who imparts knowledge, to one who facilitates and guides the cohort through the learning process. Additionally, there's an emergence of a social aspect to this type of learning through Web 2.0 as evidenced by the explosion of such outlets as Facebook, Twitter, etc. Innovative educators are embracing these technologies rather than seeing them simply as a fad. One could argue there's a revolution afoot in education and the use of Web 2.0 and beyond. Interesting stuff to say the least . . . .
Kem,
ReplyDeleteDo you think the more effective educators have always facilitated and guided students through the learning process and that the Web 2.0 environment is a tool that will enhance the process? Maybe even guiding the most pedantic of instructors into a more facilitative role?
John - I fondly remember my high school physics teach, Colonel Dillon (USAF Retired). He, as you put it, guided me and inspired me to analyze, critique, and hypothesize. He wasn't imparting knowledge; he was leading us to love learn. I would agree with your assessment . . .
ReplyDelete